RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04792
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Reentry (RE) code 2X which denotes, 1st term, 2nd term or
career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment be
changed so she can reenlist.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her behavior was not deserving of a 2X RE code.
She learned while attempting to reenlist in the Air Force
Reserve that her RE code disqualified her from reenlistment.
While researching her options, she was directed to apply to the
Board.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 25 Jul 01, the applicant entered active duty.
According to AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program
Consideration, dated 16 May 06, her supervisor recommended she
be denied reenlistment and the recommendation was approved by
her commander. The specific reasons were her poor
organizational skills and lack of initiative. She was
decertified and reissued her 5-level Career Development Course
(CDC) which she failed to complete in a timely manner. She had
an Unfavorable Information File (UIF), a referral Enlisted
Performance Report (EPR), a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for
failure to follow a direct order and several Letters of
Counseling (LOC) for her work performance. She was given
numerous chances to improve her work performance and proficiency
but failed to comply with Air Force standards and core values.
On 17 May 06, the applicant acknowledged her non-selection for
reenlistment and indicated her intent to appeal the decision.
However; there is no documentation to show she submitted her
appeal within the required 10 calendar days.
According to her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty, on 15 Mar 07, she was honorably
discharged with an RE code of 2X and narrative reason for
separation of Discharge.
She served 5 years, 7 months and 21 days on active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. The applicant does not provide
any proof of an error or injustice in reference to her RE code.
AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, states
commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-
selection authority. The Selective Reenlistment Program (SRB)
considers the members EPR ratings, UIF, airmans willingness to
comply with standards and the ability to meet required training
and duty performance levels. The applicant was non-selected for
reenlistment based on her own actions. Her supervisor states
she had poor organizational skills, lacked initiative and needed
constant supervision to complete minor tasks. Additionally, her
job knowledge was so deficient she had to be decertified
(downgraded from a 5-skill to a 3-skill level) and reissued her
5-level CDC. She also had a UIF with a LOR and several LOCs for
work performance.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 10 Jan 14, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit
D). As of this date, this office has not received a response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, we
find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-04792 in Executive Session on 29 Jul 14 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following pertinent documentary was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Sep 13.
Exhibit B. Applicants Military Personnel Records
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 10 Dec 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jan 14.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03715
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03715 INDEX CODE: 100.06, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive a reenlistment (RE) code that would enable her to reenlist in the Air Force or at least, in the Air National Guard (ANG) and that the following be removed from her record: 1. While she contends she received...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02111
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02111 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X meaning 1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment, be changed to a code allowing reentry in the Service. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01614
His commander denied his reenlistment request and stated the applicant displayed an inability to comply with Air Force standards and Core Values. On 30 Jun 10, the applicant was separated with an honorable discharge due to his non-selection for reenlistment; with an RE code of 2X and a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JBK (Completion of Required Active Service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01474
On 3 Jul 12, AFPC/DPSOA requested the applicant provide the documents she contends were added to her appeal package without due process. On 24 Jul 12, in response to DPSOA’s request, she stated after submitting her appeal package to the Force Support Squadron, she inquired about the status and was informed her unit had provided additional documentation (i.e. LOC, dated 7 Sep 11, LOC, dated 3 Nov 11, and a LOR, dated 2 Mar 12) to legal for their recommendation to the group commander. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04879
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04879 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a 1 series. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02189
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02189 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. The raters comments state Member elected not to provide comments to the referral memo dated 24 Nov 2010. On 18 Feb 11, the applicants squadron commander did not select her for reenlistment stating she had received an Article 15 for drawing a sexual innuendo...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02205 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry Code (RE) of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed to 3V (Separated w/Vol Sep Incentive) so he can enlist in the Utah Air National Guard. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04859
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 Jan 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Mar 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03836
However, his chain of command fabricated two additional LORs in order to involuntarily dismiss him from the military, and then denied his reenlistment in Mar 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an...